AMD’s Ryzen Processor is Ready to Take On Intel
Subscribe:  iCal  |  Google Calendar
7, Mar — 1, Jun
San Jose US   17, Mar — 22, Mar
San Francisco US   18, Mar — 23, Mar
San Francisco US   18, Mar — 23, Mar
York US   26, Mar — 29, Mar
Latest comments
by Guy L
3 hours ago


by crowbringer
9 hours ago

This priest surely committed to his celibate there...

Cheap art will be just that. The true value lies in commitment and hard work. This is just a tool and without a creative mind operating it the results will hold no magic. Did photography kill painting? I think both are doing and developing rather well.

AMD's Ryzen Processor is Ready to Take On Intel
23 February, 2017

AMD has finally presented the first three Ryzen processors, which will be available to buy on March 2. The thing here is that AMD’s Ryzen can finally compete with Intel’s solutions and here is why. All three processors are said to use AMD’s brand-new Zen core. Processors are eight-core, 16-thread parts with a 16MB level 3 cache shared across all cores, unlocked for overclocking.

Here are the official specs:

The top-priority target here is the Ryzen 7 1800X, of course, with a base clock of 3.6GHz and a maximum turbo clock of 4.0GHz. It is worth noting that if you look at Intel Core i7-6900K, AMD has Intel beat on clock speeds with incredible pricing. Ryzen processors cost less than half as much as Intel’s ‘equivalent’ 8-core/16-thread part.

Then comes the Ryzen 7 1700X, an alternative to the i7-6800K, with a core count advantage, a lower price by about $40, clockspeed advantage on the turbo clock – 3.8GHz compared to the 6800K’s 3.6GHz. Ryzen 7 1700 takes the third place, beating Intel’s 4-core/8-thread i7-7700K with a lower price and twice as many cores/threads. AMD also presents a power advantage with the 1700 sporting a 65W TDP. 

No independent benchmarking as of this moment, but AMD revealed numerous benchmarks via live demonstrations. Here are the results AMD’s solutions are said to show:

1800X scores about nine percent higher than the i7-6900K in the multi-threaded test. When it comes to the single-threaded result, AMD matches the i7-6900K with a result of 162. AMD also mentioned HandBrake encoding, where the 1800X took 61.8 seconds and the 6900K required 71.8 seconds.

Ryzen 7 1700X shows a Cinebench score of 1,537 compared to 1,108 on the i7-6800K and 1,474 on the i7-6900K. A $399 part takes on a $1050 part to show an amazing result.

Here comes an interesting part. AMD had a ‘mega-tasking’ demonstration, where specialists combined Blender 3D rendering, HandBrake encoding, and Octane 2.0. It took the 6800K 112.3 seconds compared to 92.0 seconds on the 1700X. It means speed, our fellow artists. Pure speed. 

Then Ryzen 7 1700 takes on the i7-7700K, showing dominating results at Cinebench multi-threaded.

Let’s sum things up. For the first time in ten years, AMD shows amazing CPU performance, at least in benchmarks. The new solutions come with great possibilities not only for games, but most importantly for you, our fellow readers. You can render, create scenes and preview things much faster with Ryzen. We still need independent testing, but things are looking good. We’ll keep an eye on independent reviews that will be appearing on March 2. 

Source: PC Gamer

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
AdminNevo Recent comment authors

it’s too late to judge, but you can definitely go with AMD now.


R.I.P Intel….Been robbing us for years.