Cataclysm by NVIDIA: Flood Your City In UE4
Subscribe:  iCal  |  Google Calendar
Milwaukee US   17, Jun — 22, Jun
New York US   17, Jun — 20, Jun
St. Petersburg RU   19, Jun — 21, Jun
TBA BR   22, Jun — 24, Jun
Amsterdam NL   25, Jun — 28, Jun
Latest comments

Hi, is it possible to download it somewhere else other than the marketplace?

Amazing work. I would really appriciate if you post a tutorial about that ornament. Thanks

by Yes
19 hours ago

Gabe is amazing and im happy to have him basicaly be the face of gaming. If you have something against him reply to this, i would love to discus

Cataclysm by NVIDIA: Flood Your City In UE4
9 August, 2016

NVIDIA has presented an R&D demo project called Cataclysm. Cataclysm is described as an effort to reach the scale of water simulation needed to flood a city scene with realistic-looking water. The software is developed with the help of Unreal Engine 4. The Cataclysm liquid solver has the power to simulate up to two million liquid particles within the UE4 engine in real time.

It uses a custom FLIP based GPU solver combined with Unreal Engine 4’s GPU Particles with Distance Field Collisions. A FLIP solver is a hybrid grid and particle technique for simulating fluids. All Information for the fluid simulation is carried on particles, but the solution the physical simulation of the liquid is carried out on a grid. Once the grid solve is complete, the particles gather back up the information they need from the grid to move forward in time to the next frame. 


And here are more details on the technology from NVIDIA:

Liquid Boundary

At the beginning of the frame, there is no grid to simulate the fluids on, only particles with position and velocity. The first thing the solver does is identify the the liquid boundary that is inside the bounding box of the FLIP solver domain. The liquid boundary is different from the liquid surface we render, and the distinction between the surface and the boundary is important because the liquid boundary is only seen by the solver, and anything within that boundary is solved on the grid. There are two ways to create the surface. The particle positions and a Smooth Kernel Radius parameter are used to splat the particles into a 3D smooth density texture . If the Surface at Density parameter is positive, then the liquid domain will be the level set of the smooth density field at that value. If the Surface at Density is 0 or a negative value, than the liquid domain will use spheres at the particle locations and the Particle Radius parameter to create the outline of the liquid domain. In that case it will also ignore any particles that have a smooth density value greater than the absolute value of Surface at Density. The most detailed liquid domains will come from a 0 Surface at Density value, but that can make single particle cause noise and float on the surface, so generally a small negative value is best for a detailed liquid boundary, or a positive value can be used for a liquid boundary that is faster to create but less detailed.

Solid Boundary

The Solid boundary is created for the solver from the same distance fields UE4 uses for GPU particle collision, which is the reason Liquid particles have to have the Distance Field collision type on their collision module. We want the solid boundary that the simulation sees to be the same one that the particles see. The solid boundary is used to set up the other set of boundary conditions for the fluid solver. The Voxel Width controls the voxel size of the grid, but the solid boundaries have a bit more detail because Cataclysm uses the variational boundary technique.

If you want to have your levels hold water, then you will need to have closed meshes for your level geometry, and they should be thicker than the Voxel Width. Meshes can be smaller, but the fluid simulation will leak through them or go around them, only noticing them as partially solid voxels.

Grid Solve

Once the liquid and solid boundary are identified, the velocity from the particles is transferred to the grid with a sharp kernel. The divergence of the grid velocity is computed, and anywhere that divergence is not zero in a voxel we know that there is either too much liquid entering the voxel, or too much leaving it. A technique known as pressure projection is used, where we utilize a change in pressure to find the velocity that will make all the voxels have as close to a zero divergence as possible. The important thing for the FLIP technique is not how we get to a final velocity with a zero divergence, but that we keep the velocity from before and after the solve.

FLIP Advection

Once the grid solve is completed, the particles are moved through the grid with the final solved velocity. However, the velocity that the particles move with and the velocity that they must splat onto the grid for the next frame are not the same. Each particle also has a splat velocity stored on it. The PICSmoothing parameter is what controls the value of the splat velocity. If you want a very damped simulation, you can increase the PICSmoothing to 1, and the final velocity interpolated from the grid will be the same as the splat velocity. Because linear interpolation is used to get the velocity from the grid, and because the voxels are rather large, a PICSmoothing of 1 is not recommended. If the PICSmoothing is 0, then particles will keep their existing splat velocity, and instead of replacing it with the interpolated grid velocity, we just subtract the difference of the interpolated grid velocity before and after the grid solve. So, even though the particle is moved forward in time with the pure interpolated grid velocity, the information it carries in the splat velocity about the change in grid velocity gives the particles higher resolution detail, and makes the simulation much more lively and dynamic looking. A little PIC smoothing will help the particles though, so the value defaults to a small non zero value.

You can get more details and all of the code to FLIP solver implementation here.

Source: NVIDIA

Leave a Reply