Photogrammetry Tools: ReMake, PhotoScan, RealityCapture or 3DF Zephyr?
Subscribe:  iCal  |  Google Calendar
7, Mar — 12, Jun
San Francisco US   19, Mar — 24, Mar
Anaheim US   23, Mar — 26, Mar
San Jose US   26, Mar — 30, Mar
Washington US   30, Mar — 2, Apr
Latest comments

Well, small/medium intuos pro is way cheaper that iPad Pro + pencil... just saying... And it works better with ZBrush...

by some guy
10 hours ago

It might ultimately be proof of concept now, but the point of showing a low-count bounce raytracing that still looks decent especially after denoising gives us a nice roadmap on the future. Maybe given time, we will move to this as the new standard or at least a probable alternate to baked lighting.

by Nathan Ayotte
10 hours ago

Fuck you I'm stuck in some bullshit game some dickhead thought would be exciting.

Photogrammetry Tools: ReMake, PhotoScan, RealityCapture or 3DF Zephyr?
8 November, 2017

What is the best photogrammetry tool? AutoDesk ReMake, Agisoft PhotoScan, RealityCapture, 3DF Zephyr or something else? Nick Lievendag has published a breakdown of 4 photogrammetry competitors to help you figure that out. 

Nick decided to start his review with a simple question: “What can they produce in 15 minutes?” All 3D scanning methods require time for processing and this time mostly depends on the accuracy of the scanner. The artist took a processing time average between processing times of depth sensor software like Skanect and professional-grade solutions like EinScan and Artec Studio.

Nick states that for “everyday projects where speed is more important than ultimate quality, the 15-20 minute mark can be considered “fast”. 

So, the first part is about efficiency and productivity rather that beautiful 3D shots. Let’s dive into Nick’s “Photogrammetry Software Drag Race”.

Here are some details on the initial setup:

Again, nothing special here and the photo set is quite small. I shot (just) 57 of this 40cm tall stone bust, outdoors, with my 21-megapixel Sony RX100 II camera on a Manfrotto Action Tripod. Two cycles from an upward and downwards-facing angle and a few extra photos.

Manual focus, low ISO, small aperture, locked auto-exposure.

In other words: something anyone can do. But results always depend on the subject. This bust can be considered an easy subject because it’s opaque, matte and has a lot of surface detail.

My testing procedure for this benchmark was very simple: find a setting in each software that produces a result in under 20 minutes on my (otherwise idle) system.

Nick Lievendag

You can find the full review here

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!