Anthony Burch: Things to Know About Creating Games
Events
Subscribe:  iCal  |  Google Calendar
Moscow RU   16, Oct — 18, Oct
Helsinki FI   17, Oct — 25, Oct
Minsk BY   17, Oct — 19, Oct
London GB   22, Oct — 23, Oct
Singapore SG   23, Oct — 25, Oct
Latest comments

uh.. you happy with the crunch number ?

Why not just license it? Let it live and make done money at the same time.

Maybe hire more people instead of making employees work 100 hr weeks? Thats insane.

Anthony Burch: Things to Know About Creating Games
27 March, 2017
News
Kotaku has a nice article by Anthony Burch from Gearbox Software about the challenges of game development. The artist has previously worked at Destructoid as a features editor, highlighting indie games and criticizing big-budget titles he didn’t like. It appears that you should know a couple of things before you start complaining about one of the Ubisoft’s games or Mass Effect: Andromeda.  
First of all, developing a title is a thousand times harder than you think. Anthony proves this statement with his breakdown of character creation process. 

To make a new NPC, you need to concept the character (which can take weeks), then do a high-poly model. And man, do the high-poly models look great; they look perfect, in fact, except for the fact that they actually, uh, won’t be anywhere in the game. Because you actually need to make a low-poly model based on the high-poly model, which takes more time. But hey; at least you’re done now, right? Just put him in the game and let him animate. Except, oh, wait, right. You need to make the animations. But before that, you actually have to rig the character so it can animate at all – before rigging, it’s just a static model, no more animated than a 3D rock.

Anthony Burch

What is more, you have to know that games look like complete ass for 90% of their production. Here is how playable character named Krieg the psycho from Borderlands 2 looked like for the vast majority of development:

You are also wrong when you think developers don’t know something sucks. “What were the devs thinking?!” You probably yell at your screen sometimes, complaining about countless bugs in Wildlands and blaming the entire development team, because they didn’t know about your problems. 

As it turns out? They quite possibly did. Game devs are not a bunch of oblivious monkeys who smash their keyboards with crosseyed indifference—they often know what works and what doesn’t, and why. When particular aspects of a game end up being less than stellar, it’s likely not because the developers are dumb, it’s because time and money constraints forced them to make tough choices.

As a for-instance: why are most video game endings kind of disappointing? Is it because the developers are stupid and don’t know how to bring closure? Or is it because, on average, only a small percentage of the people who buy your game will see its ending and every moment you spend polishing it is one you haven’t spent on other parts of the game? Parts that a way bigger chunk of your players will actually interact with?

Anthony Burch

You really have to read the full post here. Tons of other insights on the life of game developers. 

Source: Kotaku

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

avatar
wpDiscuz