logo80lv
Articlesclick_arrow
Research
Talentsclick_arrow
Events
Workshops
Aboutclick_arrow
profile_loginLogIn

Nintendo Wants $66K for Palworld Infringing upon Patents Filed After Pocketpair's Game Release

This is personal.

Pocketpair

Palworld's developer Pocketpair has published an update to Nintendo's lawsuit case, stating that it and The Pokémon Company want 5 million yen (about $33,000) plus late payment damages each for patent infringement.

The interesting detail in this mess is that the patents in question were filed after Palworld was released.

"The Plaintiffs claim that 'Palworld,' released by us on January 19, 2024, infringes upon the following three patents held by the Plaintiffs, and are seeking an injunction against the game and compensation for a portion of the damages incurred between the date of registration of the patents and the date of filing of this lawsuit."

Here are the patents:

  • Patent No. 7545191 (application date: July 30, 2024; registration date: August 27, 2024)
  • Patent No. 7493117 (application date: February 26, 2024; registration date: May 22, 2024)
  • Patent No. 7528390 (application date: March 5, 2024; registration date: July 26, 2024)

From what I've seen, they describe Pokémon Rides and throwing and catching Poké Balls. So yes, it seems like Nintendo couldn't find the grounds to sue Pocketpair for obvious art style inspiration, so it created new patents to tie to the case.

Pocketpair promises to "continue to assert our position in this case through future legal proceedings."

What do you think about the situation? Who is right here? Find Pocketpair's statement here and join our 80 Level Talent platform and our new Discord server, follow us on InstagramTwitterLinkedInTelegramTikTok, and Threads, where we share breakdowns, the latest news, awesome artworks, and more.

Join discussion

Comments 1

  • Anonymous user

    Not only the company name reminds of Pokémon, they even promoted the game as "Pokémon with guns" so yeah.  (The media is responsible for promoting this too.) Although it would be a stretch legally, you could even call the whole thing a derivative. A spin-off.  Despite the fact these patents were filed later, the material of the patents is de facto a Pokémon Company and Nintendo intellectual property.

    0

    Anonymous user

    ·a month ago·

You might also like

We need your consent

We use cookies on this website to make your browsing experience better. By using the site you agree to our use of cookies.Learn more